Zimbabwean vs Brazilian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,988,735 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 39.4 Brazilians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,465, a difference of 7.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,335, a difference of 6.0%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $106,942, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,229 compared to $48,356, a difference of 0.26%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $98,267, a difference of 0.32%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $40,483, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 18.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.80%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.2%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 5.9%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.28%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.52%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.3%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.30%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.2%).