Bahamian vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Bahamian
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Bahamians
Chinese
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Bahamian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,797,548 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Bahamian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bahamians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bahamians corresponds to an increase of 43.9 Chinese.
Bahamian vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($51,000 compared to $77,465, a difference of 51.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($81,369 compared to $116,156, a difference of 42.7%), and median household income ($69,726 compared to $98,496, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,125 compared to $41,461, a difference of 18.0%), median earnings ($39,735 compared to $48,836, a difference of 22.9%), and per capita income ($36,427 compared to $46,098, a difference of 26.6%).
Income Metric | Bahamian | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,427 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,631 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,726 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,735 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $44,756 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,125 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,743 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $75,395 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $81,369 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,000 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 20.2% | Average 25.9% |
Bahamian vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 81.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 81.6%), and family poverty (11.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 80.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 16.6%), single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 27.3%), and single male poverty (14.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 32.5%).
Poverty Metric | Bahamian | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 16.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.0% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.3% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Bahamian vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 34.8%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 33.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 20.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Bahamian | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Bahamian vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.79%).
Labor Participation Metric | Bahamian | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.2% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.4% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.6% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.3% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.9% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Bahamian vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 59.9%), births to unmarried women (40.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 34.8%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.28 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (63.3% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Bahamian | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.5% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.5% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.28 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.2% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 40.8% | Excellent 30.2% |
Bahamian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 74.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 40.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Bahamian | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Bahamian vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 51.7%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.79%), 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.80%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.81%).
Education Level Metric | Bahamian | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.6% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.5% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.5% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.5% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.5% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.4% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Bahamian vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 34.6%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.1%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.16%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.76%).
Disability Metric | Bahamian | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |