Bahamian vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bahamian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bahamians

Chinese

Tragic
Exceptional
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Bahamian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,797,548 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Bahamian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bahamians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bahamians corresponds to an increase of 43.9 Chinese.
Bahamian Integration in Chinese Communities

Bahamian vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($51,000 compared to $77,465, a difference of 51.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($81,369 compared to $116,156, a difference of 42.7%), and median household income ($69,726 compared to $98,496, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,125 compared to $41,461, a difference of 18.0%), median earnings ($39,735 compared to $48,836, a difference of 22.9%), and per capita income ($36,427 compared to $46,098, a difference of 26.6%).
Bahamian vs Chinese Income
Income MetricBahamianChinese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,427
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,631
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,726
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,735
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,756
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,125
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,743
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$75,395
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,369
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,000
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.2%
Average
25.9%

Bahamian vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 81.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 81.6%), and family poverty (11.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 80.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 16.6%), single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 27.3%), and single male poverty (14.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 32.5%).
Bahamian vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricBahamianChinese
Poverty
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Tragic
16.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.0%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
9.8%

Bahamian vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 34.8%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 33.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 20.0%).
Bahamian vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBahamianChinese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.4%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%

Bahamian vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.79%).
Bahamian vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBahamianChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.4%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.3%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.9%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
84.1%

Bahamian vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 59.9%), births to unmarried women (40.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 34.8%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.28 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (63.3% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.6%).
Bahamian vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBahamianChinese
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.5%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.5%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.28
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.2%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.8%
Excellent
30.2%

Bahamian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 74.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 40.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.3%).
Bahamian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBahamianChinese
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
8.8%

Bahamian vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 51.7%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.79%), 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.80%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.81%).
Bahamian vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricBahamianChinese
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Poor
95.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.3%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.5%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.5%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.5%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.4%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.8%

Bahamian vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 34.6%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.1%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.16%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.76%).
Bahamian vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricBahamianChinese
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%