Tohono O'odham vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,007,357 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.962. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 11.3 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($72,193 compared to $116,188, a difference of 60.9%), median household income ($61,663 compared to $98,496, a difference of 59.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $77,465, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 17.0%), median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $41,461, a difference of 24.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $58,162, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 213.5%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 207.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 166.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 42.9%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 74.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 91.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 111.5%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 106.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (12.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 98.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 23.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 93.8%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 76.9%), and births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 64.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.1% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.53 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.8%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 90.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 33.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 8.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 26.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 57.5%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.0%), and professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 91.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 66.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 13.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 16.4%).