Zimbabwean vs Pueblo Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Pueblo
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Pueblo
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,100
SOCIAL INDEX
18.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
270th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pueblo Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,422,851 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pueblo within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.233% in Pueblo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 233.4 Pueblo.
Zimbabwean vs Pueblo Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($110,011 compared to $76,880, a difference of 43.1%), per capita income ($45,804 compared to $32,012, a difference of 43.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $68,910, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $45,018, a difference of 13.9%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $52,930, a difference of 24.4%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $32,564, a difference of 25.3%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Pueblo |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Tragic $32,012 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Tragic $76,880 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Tragic $64,692 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Tragic $36,859 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Tragic $41,314 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Tragic $32,564 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Tragic $45,018 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Tragic $68,910 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Tragic $75,601 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Tragic $52,930 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Exceptional 20.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Pueblo Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 172.5%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 117.8%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 110.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 31.7%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 33.1%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 35.5%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Pueblo |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 19.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 26.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 22.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 23.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 23.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 23.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 25.2% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 21.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 28.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 21.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 37.2% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 11.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 17.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 19.9% |
Zimbabwean vs Pueblo Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 77.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 71.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Pueblo |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 8.5% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 10.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Pueblo Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 72.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Pueblo |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Tragic 59.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Tragic 72.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Tragic 72.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 75.5% |
Zimbabwean vs Pueblo Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 87.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 49.5%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 6.5%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 10.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Pueblo |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Exceptional 68.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 25.2% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 40.0% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.79 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Tragic 7.4% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 38.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 53.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Pueblo Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 33.2%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.42%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Pueblo |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Fair 10.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Fair 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 57.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Zimbabwean vs Pueblo Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 72.5%), bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 69.5%), and associate's degree (51.3% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Pueblo |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Excellent 95.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Tragic 91.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 88.2% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Tragic 86.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 82.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 57.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Tragic 51.5% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Tragic 34.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 25.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 10.3% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Poor 1.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Pueblo Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Pueblo communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 69.8%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 62.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.1%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Pueblo |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 14.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 15.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Fair 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 15.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 33.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Tragic 55.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.3% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Tragic 4.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.7% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.6% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.3% |