Zimbabwean vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Ecuadorians
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,564,218 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.008. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 6.7 Ecuadorians.
Zimbabwean vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $54,958, a difference of 19.8%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $95,114, a difference of 15.7%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $39,117, a difference of 4.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $53,911, a difference of 5.2%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $45,214, a difference of 6.7%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Zimbabwean vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 59.5%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 56.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.8%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.8%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 14.9% |
Zimbabwean vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 33.0%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Zimbabwean vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 23.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 82.3% |
Zimbabwean vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.7%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.43%), family households (64.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Poor 33.3% |
Zimbabwean vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 151.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 16.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 36.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 44.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Tragic 4.5% |
Zimbabwean vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 71.0%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 55.7%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Zimbabwean vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.7%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.82%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |