Dutch vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,623,365 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Dutch communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dutch within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dutch corresponds to an increase of 2.0 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dutch and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,539 compared to $77,465, a difference of 30.1%), median household income ($82,971 compared to $98,496, a difference of 18.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,650 compared to $116,156, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,410 compared to $56,872, a difference of 4.5%), median earnings ($45,370 compared to $48,836, a difference of 7.6%), and per capita income ($42,605 compared to $46,098, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dutch and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (22.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.3%), single male poverty (14.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 28.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dutch and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 76.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dutch and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dutch and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.4%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.6% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.18%), married-couple households (49.5% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and births to unmarried women (31.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dutch and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dutch and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.6%), associate's degree (45.0% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and bachelor's degree (35.7% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dutch and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 47.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 28.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.81%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and female disability (12.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.7%).