Chilean vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chilean
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chileans
Chinese
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Chilean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,296,024 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.970. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.504% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 504.4 Chinese.
Chilean vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $77,465, a difference of 21.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $58,162, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $116,156, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $56,872, a difference of 0.18%), median earnings ($48,504 compared to $48,836, a difference of 0.68%), and per capita income ($46,459 compared to $46,098, a difference of 0.78%).
Income Metric | Chilean | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,459 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,429 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,605 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,504 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,973 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,757 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,900 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,611 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,957 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Average 25.9% |
Chilean vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 39.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 35.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.0%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.4%).
Poverty Metric | Chilean | Chinese |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Excellent 4.9% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Chilean vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 42.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chilean | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Chilean vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.70%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chilean | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 84.9% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Chilean vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.7%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.3%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (65.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 4.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chilean | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.7% | Excellent 30.2% |
Chilean vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 38.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 21.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chilean | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.2% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.1% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Chilean vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.5%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.9%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.0% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.32%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.58%).
Education Level Metric | Chilean | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.7% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.0% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.2% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.9% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Fair 1.8% |
Chilean vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.58%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Disability Metric | Chilean | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |