Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,126,813 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.196. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.188% in Immigrants from Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 187.6 Immigrants from Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $50,950, a difference of 11.2%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $62,057, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $106,817, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $64,828, a difference of 1.6%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $111,984, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 9.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.23%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.9%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), family households (64.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 38.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.1%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (51.3% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Europe communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.6%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.4%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.3%).