Polish vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Polish
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Poles
Chinese
8,413
SOCIAL INDEX
81.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
72nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Polish Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,743,496 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Polish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.230. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Poles within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Poles corresponds to an increase of 9.2 Chinese.
Polish vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Polish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,598 compared to $77,465, a difference of 25.8%), median household income ($88,472 compared to $98,496, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,407 compared to $58,162, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,123 compared to $46,098, a difference of 0.050%), median earnings ($48,659 compared to $48,836, a difference of 0.36%), and median male earnings ($58,139 compared to $56,872, a difference of 2.2%).
Income Metric | Polish | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,123 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,507 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $88,472 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,659 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $58,139 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,371 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,407 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,685 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $105,952 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,598 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.5% | Average 25.9% |
Polish vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Polish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (20.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 23.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 10.4%).
Poverty Metric | Polish | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.8% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Poor 13.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.4% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Polish vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Polish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 74.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Polish | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.4% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Polish vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Polish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.71%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.45%).
Labor Participation Metric | Polish | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 42.1% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.6% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.8% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.5% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Polish vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Polish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.3%), average family size (3.09 compared to 3.34, a difference of 8.0%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Polish | Chinese |
Family Households | Poor 64.0% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.5% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.09 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.9% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.8% | Excellent 30.2% |
Polish vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Polish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 38.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.19%), no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Polish | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.7% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.3% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.2% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.4% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Polish vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Polish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 8.1%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and college, 1 year or more (60.7% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Polish | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.4% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.5% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.9% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.7% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 48.0% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 39.1% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Excellent 15.7% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Fair 1.8% |
Polish vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Polish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 39.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.21%), male disability (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and female disability (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Disability Metric | Polish | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.5% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.3% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |