South African vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,813,215 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within South African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.948. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Africans corresponds to an increase of 43.8 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South African and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,652 compared to $77,465, a difference of 18.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,383 compared to $58,162, a difference of 13.2%), and per capita income ($50,044 compared to $46,098, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,825 compared to $41,461, a difference of 0.88%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,160 compared to $104,264, a difference of 1.1%), and median family income ($113,229 compared to $116,188, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South African and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 30.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.0%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South African and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South African and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South African and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and family households (63.4% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.86%), currently married (47.6% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South African and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 42.6%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South African and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.6%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.7%), and master's degree (18.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South African and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 19.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.7%).