Immigrants from Caribbean vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,520,554 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $77,465, a difference of 59.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,513 compared to $116,156, a difference of 40.8%), and median family income ($83,319 compared to $116,188, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $41,461, a difference of 13.9%), householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $58,162, a difference of 14.6%), and median earnings ($41,119 compared to $48,836, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 101.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 101.2%), and receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 100.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 12.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 18.4%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 38.8%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 35.9%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 8.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 23.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 62.2%), births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 31.7%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.33 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.44%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (65.3% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 138.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 99.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 14.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 35.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 63.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 97.4%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 37.8%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 41.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.9%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.75%), disability (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.0%).