Finnish vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Finnish
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Finns
Chinese
6,815
SOCIAL INDEX
65.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
141st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Finnish Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,573,725 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.107. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Chinese.
Finnish vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $77,465, a difference of 30.1%), median household income ($83,607 compared to $98,496, a difference of 17.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,904 compared to $116,156, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,721 compared to $56,872, a difference of 3.9%), per capita income ($43,461 compared to $46,098, a difference of 6.1%), and median earnings ($45,940 compared to $48,836, a difference of 6.3%).
Income Metric | Finnish | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,461 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Average $102,676 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,607 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,940 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,721 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,173 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,827 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $94,610 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $99,904 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,535 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.6% | Average 25.9% |
Finnish vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 33.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 28.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.0%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 12.5%).
Poverty Metric | Finnish | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.3% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Poor 21.5% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.0% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Finnish vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 68.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.76%).
Unemployment Metric | Finnish | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Finnish vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 13.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.70%).
Labor Participation Metric | Finnish | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.2% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.5% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.9% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.7% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.1% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Finnish vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.8%), divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 4.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Finnish | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.1% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.09 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.7% | Excellent 30.2% |
Finnish vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 21.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.39%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.63%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Finnish | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.3% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.3% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Finnish vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.0%), bachelor's degree (36.7% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and associate's degree (46.3% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.7% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | Finnish | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.4% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.7% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.2% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.9% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.2% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.3% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.7% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.2% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Fair 1.8% |
Finnish vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 39.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 28.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.15%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.9%).
Disability Metric | Finnish | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.8% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |