Belizean vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,502,165 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Belizean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belizeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.144% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belizeans corresponds to an increase of 144.0 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,580 compared to $77,465, a difference of 41.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,684 compared to $116,156, a difference of 31.0%), and median household income ($77,028 compared to $98,496, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,429 compared to $41,461, a difference of 10.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,094 compared to $58,162, a difference of 13.8%), and median earnings ($42,702 compared to $48,836, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 79.6%), family poverty (11.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 73.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 67.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.3%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 22.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 41.5%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 26.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 17.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.4%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.0%), and births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.39 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.4%), family households (64.8% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 74.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 40.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 7.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 28.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 103.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.7%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 33.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 19.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.59%), female disability (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.3%).