Zimbabwean vs Yup'ik Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yup'ik
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Yup'ik

Exceptional
Fair
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,388
SOCIAL INDEX
21.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
262nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yup'ik Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,342,917 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.103% in Yup'ik. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 103.4 Yup'ik.
Zimbabwean Integration in Yup'ik Communities

Zimbabwean vs Yup'ik Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $30,518, a difference of 50.1%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $39,504, a difference of 42.5%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $79,290, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 6.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,732, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $60,727, a difference of 8.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Yup'ik Income
Income MetricZimbabweanYup'ik
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Tragic
$30,518
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Tragic
$79,290
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Tragic
$69,695
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Tragic
$35,942
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Tragic
$39,504
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Tragic
$32,730
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Exceptional
$54,732
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Tragic
$73,688
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Tragic
$81,000
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Average
$60,727
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
24.7%

Zimbabwean vs Yup'ik Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 244.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 228.2%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 141.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 16.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 32.3%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 36.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Yup'ik Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanYup'ik
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
20.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
18.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
20.4%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
21.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
27.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
24.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
27.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
25.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
24.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
25.8%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
26.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
32.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
32.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
13.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
14.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
15.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
32.7%

Zimbabwean vs Yup'ik Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 282.1%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 244.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 233.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 46.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 59.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 64.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Yup'ik Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanYup'ik
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
13.6%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
16.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
10.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
23.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
41.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
17.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
18.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
9.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
9.1%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
21.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
18.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
11.0%

Zimbabwean vs Yup'ik Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 15.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 70.9%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 7.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Yup'ik Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanYup'ik
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Tragic
62.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Tragic
73.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
33.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
70.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
73.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
76.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
78.6%

Zimbabwean vs Yup'ik Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 143.5%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 96.7%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 65.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 7.5%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and family households (64.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 13.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Yup'ik Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanYup'ik
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Exceptional
72.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
37.0%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
44.1%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
4.00
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Tragic
10.0%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
39.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
56.4%

Zimbabwean vs Yup'ik Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 407.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 63.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 36.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 55.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Yup'ik Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanYup'ik
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
45.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
58.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
34.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
14.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
5.7%

Zimbabwean vs Yup'ik Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 123.0%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 107.3%), and associate's degree (51.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 105.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and 8th grade (96.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.53%).
Zimbabwean vs Yup'ik Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanYup'ik
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
99.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
99.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
99.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
99.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
99.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
91.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
87.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
86.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
80.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
45.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Tragic
39.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Tragic
25.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
19.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
8.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.3%

Zimbabwean vs Yup'ik Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Yup'ik communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 284.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 105.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 75.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Yup'ik Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanYup'ik
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
4.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
37.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
61.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.7%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
1.9%