Scotch-Irish vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,526,883 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Scotch-Irish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.666. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scotch-Irish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.234% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scotch-Irish corresponds to an increase of 233.5 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,447 compared to $77,465, a difference of 30.3%), median household income ($80,972 compared to $98,496, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,073 compared to $116,156, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($53,658 compared to $56,872, a difference of 6.0%), per capita income ($42,563 compared to $46,098, a difference of 8.3%), and median earnings ($44,924 compared to $48,836, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (22.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 42.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 39.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 7.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 14.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 68.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.2%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.8%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (48.3% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (45.3% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 7.2%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and college, 1 year or more (58.9% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 49.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 34.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 4.1%).