Immigrants from Liberia vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,314,544 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.168. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to a decrease of 20.0 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,967 compared to $77,465, a difference of 43.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,739 compared to $116,156, a difference of 32.4%), and median household income ($74,896 compared to $98,496, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $41,461, a difference of 9.2%), median earnings ($42,923 compared to $48,836, a difference of 13.8%), and median male earnings ($48,317 compared to $56,872, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 66.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 65.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 63.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.1%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.6%), and single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 84.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 31.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 68.7%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.0%), and married-couple households (40.3% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and family households (62.0% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 65.1%), no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 48.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 39.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 67.8%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 29.9%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.99%), male disability (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.4%).