Immigrants from Serbia vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,747,674 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Serbia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.846. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Serbia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.337% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Serbia corresponds to an increase of 1,337.4 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,387 compared to $77,465, a difference of 22.2%), per capita income ($50,810 compared to $46,098, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,321 compared to $58,162, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 0.45%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,155 compared to $104,264, a difference of 1.1%), and median family income ($113,463 compared to $116,188, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 33.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 25.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.92%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.94%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 38.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.8% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family households (61.6% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 10.6%), married-couple households (45.7% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and births to unmarried women (28.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 76.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 45.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 44.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.5%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 30.3%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Serbia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 23.0%), male disability (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.9%).