Zimbabwean vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,687,506 people shows no correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 1.6 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $50,575, a difference of 10.4%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $61,199, a difference of 8.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $105,085, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $67,333, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $53,294, a difference of 4.0%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $42,446, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.49%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.9%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.33%), currently married (47.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.52%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.6%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.0% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.8%).