Luxembourger vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Luxembourgers
Chinese
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Luxembourger Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,551,221 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.944. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.804% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 803.7 Chinese.
Luxembourger vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $77,465, a difference of 27.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $58,162, a difference of 15.4%), and median household income ($86,418 compared to $98,496, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,663 compared to $46,098, a difference of 0.95%), median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $56,872, a difference of 1.0%), and median earnings ($47,640 compared to $48,836, a difference of 2.5%).
Income Metric | Luxembourger | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,663 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,183 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,418 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,640 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,300 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,891 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,379 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,237 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,536 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,967 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Average 25.9% |
Luxembourger vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 29.2%), single female poverty (20.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 26.7%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 6.4%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and male poverty (9.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.5%).
Poverty Metric | Luxembourger | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.4% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.5% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Luxembourger vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 30.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Luxembourger | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Luxembourger vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Luxembourger | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.7% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.9% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 45.3% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 79.0% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.9% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.6% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.4% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Luxembourger vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.1%), family households (63.3% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.3% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.46%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Luxembourger | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.10 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.3% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.4% | Excellent 30.2% |
Luxembourger vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 53.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 33.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 14.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Luxembourger | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 94.8% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.1% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.9% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Luxembourger vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.8%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%), 9th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.050%).
Education Level Metric | Luxembourger | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.7% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.6% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.2% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.1% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Excellent 39.8% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.3% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 1.9% | Fair 1.8% |
Luxembourger vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.9%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.8%).
Disability Metric | Luxembourger | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 44.8% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |