Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,925,488 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.183% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 183.0 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,976, a difference of 6.3%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $106,188, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $40,739, a difference of 0.14%), median earnings ($48,229 compared to $48,041, a difference of 0.39%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $56,064, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.2%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 23.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.3%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.36%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 10.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.9%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.43%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.45%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.79%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.3%).