Zimbabwean vs Creek Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Creek
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Creek
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Creek Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,214,859 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.685. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.848% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 2,848.3 Creek.
Zimbabwean vs Creek Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $78,960, a difference of 35.3%), median household income ($90,618 compared to $67,715, a difference of 33.8%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $82,560, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $45,371, a difference of 13.0%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $46,594, a difference of 20.8%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Creek |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Tragic $35,546 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Tragic $82,560 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Tragic $67,715 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Tragic $39,648 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Tragic $46,594 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Tragic $33,437 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Tragic $45,371 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Tragic $74,847 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Tragic $78,960 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Tragic $51,949 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Tragic 27.1% |
Zimbabwean vs Creek Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 64.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 59.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 18.6%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Creek |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 17.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 24.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 24.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 21.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 27.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 19.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 36.7% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
Zimbabwean vs Creek Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Creek |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 8.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Creek Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Creek |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Tragic 61.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Tragic 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Tragic 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 77.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Creek Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 30.9%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.020%), family households (64.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Creek |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Fair 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 45.3% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Poor 46.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 37.6% |
Zimbabwean vs Creek Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 16.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Creek |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 58.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Zimbabwean vs Creek Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 68.8%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 68.6%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Creek |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Tragic 52.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 28.9% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 10.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.3% |
Zimbabwean vs Creek Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 63.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 61.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 23.8%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Creek |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 15.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Tragic 51.5% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Tragic 4.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 8.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.8% |