Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Dominica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,357,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominica within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.118. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.056% in Immigrants from Dominica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 56.0 Immigrants from Dominica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $50,071, a difference of 31.5%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 31.4%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $85,411, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $50,301, a difference of 1.9%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $37,825, a difference of 7.9%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $42,420, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 94.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 74.0%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 7.3%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 51.4%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 46.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 44.1%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 37.6%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 146.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 53.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 16.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 37.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 47.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 64.3%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 63.8%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 5.4%).