Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,387,025 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.113. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Immigrants from Southern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 26.4 Immigrants from Southern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,902, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,484, a difference of 6.3%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $59,217, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.44%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $110,614, a difference of 0.55%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $107,775, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.7%), single female poverty (19.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and poverty (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 8.3%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 44.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.7%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.4%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 2.7%).