Arapaho vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arapaho
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arapaho
Chinese
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Arapaho Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,990,930 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 22.2 Chinese.
Arapaho vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $116,156, a difference of 52.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $104,264, a difference of 45.4%), and median household income ($67,965 compared to $98,496, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 10.4%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $77,465, a difference of 30.4%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $41,461, a difference of 31.7%).
Income Metric | Arapaho | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,345 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,064 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,965 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,586 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,758 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $31,489 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,003 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,697 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,945 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,383 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.5% | Average 25.9% |
Arapaho vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 99.7%), family poverty (12.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 94.5%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 80.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 35.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 39.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 40.1%).
Poverty Metric | Arapaho | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.0% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.4% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Arapaho vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 179.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 152.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 151.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 31.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Arapaho | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Arapaho vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arapaho | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.4% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.3% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.6% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.5% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 78.1% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Arapaho vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 55.8%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.2%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (66.5% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.34, a difference of 8.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Arapaho | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.6% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.64 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.5% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 47.1% | Excellent 30.2% |
Arapaho vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.25%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.93%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 5.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arapaho | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.4% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Arapaho vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 55.2%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 51.3%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.050%).
Education Level Metric | Arapaho | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.6% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.0% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Fair 1.8% |
Arapaho vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 46.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 29.4%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.88%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.9%).
Disability Metric | Arapaho | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.1% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |