Immigrants from Western Europe vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,932,725 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Western Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.812. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.359% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Europe corresponds to an increase of 359.3 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,933 compared to $77,465, a difference of 19.3%), householder income under 25 years ($52,957 compared to $58,162, a difference of 9.8%), and per capita income ($50,065 compared to $46,098, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,990 compared to $41,461, a difference of 1.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,654 compared to $104,264, a difference of 1.6%), and median family income ($112,688 compared to $116,188, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 30.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 30.0%), and single female poverty (20.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.7%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 50.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.2%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.5%), births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 40.1%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 37.9%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.2%), and master's degree (17.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.26%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and college, under 1 year (68.5% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 21.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.4%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.84%), disability (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.9%).