Zimbabwean vs Bermudan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Bermudan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Bermudans
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,838
SOCIAL INDEX
25.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
241st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Bermudan Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,085,611 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.125% in Bermudans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 124.8 Bermudans.
Zimbabwean vs Bermudan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 13.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $94,197, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $58,171, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $39,418, a difference of 3.5%), median earnings ($48,229 compared to $45,593, a difference of 5.8%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $42,911, a difference of 6.7%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Bermudan |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Fair $42,911 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Tragic $97,577 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Tragic $80,406 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Fair $45,593 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Poor $52,465 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Fair $39,418 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Tragic $47,359 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Tragic $88,231 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Tragic $94,197 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Tragic $58,171 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Exceptional 23.1% |
Zimbabwean vs Bermudan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 36.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.20%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 8.7%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Bermudan |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.9% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 21.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Average 13.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 18.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 18.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 18.1% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 22.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 16.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 30.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 13.0% |
Zimbabwean vs Bermudan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 35.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 28.0%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Bermudan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Poor 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Zimbabwean vs Bermudan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Bermudan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Good 36.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Excellent 83.1% |
Zimbabwean vs Bermudan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 23.8%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.1%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.070%), family households (64.1% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Bermudan |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 26.3% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 42.4% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 43.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 35.5% |
Zimbabwean vs Bermudan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 41.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 14.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Bermudan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Tragic 12.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Tragic 87.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 50.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Zimbabwean vs Bermudan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.3%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.2%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.32%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Bermudan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Fair 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Good 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Average 97.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Average 97.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Good 95.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Good 93.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Good 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Average 91.2% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Average 85.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Average 65.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Average 59.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Average 46.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Average 38.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Good 15.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Average 1.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Bermudan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.2%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.9%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Bermudan |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 12.3% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 11.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Excellent 46.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |