Liberian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,212,184 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Liberian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.143. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Liberians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Liberians corresponds to a decrease of 19.7 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Liberian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,356 compared to $77,465, a difference of 42.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,929 compared to $116,156, a difference of 30.6%), and median household income ($75,667 compared to $98,496, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,215 compared to $41,461, a difference of 8.5%), median earnings ($43,536 compared to $48,836, a difference of 12.2%), and median male earnings ($49,318 compared to $56,872, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Liberian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 63.4%), family poverty (10.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 63.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.9%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Liberian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 73.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 33.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Liberian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Liberian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 67.4%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.0%), and married-couple households (40.7% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.8%), family households with children (28.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and family households (62.0% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Liberian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 68.5%), no vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 40.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Liberian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 61.0%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.94%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.94%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Liberian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.31%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.4%).