Zimbabwean vs Puerto Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,430,134 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Puerto Ricans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Puerto Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 10.6 Puerto Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($110,011 compared to $70,423, a difference of 56.2%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $42,550, a difference of 54.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $69,234, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $39,726, a difference of 29.0%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $31,560, a difference of 29.3%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $35,560, a difference of 35.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 209.7%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 173.9%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 160.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 46.1%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 59.4%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 74.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 83.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 80.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 80.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 27.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 59.2%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 44.1%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.14%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.28, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 71.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 36.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 21.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 62.3%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 60.2%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Puerto Rican communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 97.6%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 71.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 9.1%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 10.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.8%).