Serbian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,921,019 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Serbian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.815. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Serbians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.557% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Serbians corresponds to an increase of 556.9 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,087 compared to $77,465, a difference of 26.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,106 compared to $58,162, a difference of 13.8%), and median household income ($87,572 compared to $98,496, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,677 compared to $48,836, a difference of 0.33%), per capita income ($46,551 compared to $46,098, a difference of 0.98%), and median male earnings ($57,975 compared to $56,872, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 26.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 25.1%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.6%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 42.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.88%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.1%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and family households (63.0% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.3%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 47.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 25.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.5%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Serbian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.52%), disability (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.7%).