Zimbabwean vs Austrian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,519,859 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Austrians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Austrians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 56.5 Austrians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 8.0%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $59,359, a difference of 5.4%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $48,116, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $40,923, a difference of 0.31%), median household income ($90,618 compared to $91,339, a difference of 0.80%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $111,306, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.1%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.10%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.42%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 8.2%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.34%), family households (64.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.33%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.1%), bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (91.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 18.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.6%).