Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from South America Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from South America
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Immigrants from South America

Exceptional
Average
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,371
SOCIAL INDEX
41.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
200th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from South America Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,811,063 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.322% in Immigrants from South America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 321.6 Immigrants from South America.
Zimbabwean Integration in Immigrants from South America Communities

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from South America Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $59,151, a difference of 11.3%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $100,414, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $99,126, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $39,643, a difference of 2.9%), median earnings ($48,229 compared to $46,548, a difference of 3.6%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $44,068, a difference of 3.9%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from South America Income
Income MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from South America
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Good
$44,068
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Fair
$100,414
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Average
$85,611
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Average
$46,548
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Fair
$53,962
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Average
$39,643
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Exceptional
$54,268
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Average
$94,042
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Fair
$99,126
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Poor
$59,151
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
24.6%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from South America Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 40.7%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 35.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.1%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from South America Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from South America
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Fair
12.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Poor
9.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Fair
11.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
17.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Good
13.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Good
17.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Average
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Fair
16.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Average
16.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Excellent
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.8%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from South America Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 20.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.6%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from South America Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from South America
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Good
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from South America Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from South America Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from South America
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
33.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Exceptional
83.2%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from South America Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 11.4%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.43%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (64.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from South America Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from South America
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Exceptional
65.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Poor
6.7%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Poor
45.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Poor
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Average
32.0%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from South America Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 24.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 21.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from South America Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from South America
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
11.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
88.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
50.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
16.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
5.2%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from South America Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 41.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.2%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.76%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.78%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from South America Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from South America
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
93.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
92.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
91.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
87.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
84.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
63.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Fair
58.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Average
46.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Good
38.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Fair
1.8%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from South America Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.18%), female disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from South America Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from South America
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Exceptional
46.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Excellent
2.4%