Argentinean vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Argentinean
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Argentineans
Chinese
8,055
SOCIAL INDEX
78.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
90th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Argentinean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,985,164 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 15.2 Chinese.
Argentinean vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $77,465, a difference of 18.7%), per capita income ($49,862 compared to $46,098, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $58,162, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,111 compared to $104,264, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $41,461, a difference of 1.2%), and median family income ($112,665 compared to $116,188, a difference of 3.1%).
Income Metric | Argentinean | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,862 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,665 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,960 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,399 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,117 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,952 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,154 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $103,111 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $110,103 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,246 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.0% | Average 25.9% |
Argentinean vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 48.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 40.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.5%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 10.5%).
Poverty Metric | Argentinean | Chinese |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Excellent 8.4% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Excellent 12.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.4% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.2% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Argentinean vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 34.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 25.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.5%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Argentinean | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Fair 5.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Argentinean vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.50%).
Labor Participation Metric | Argentinean | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.3% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.1% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Argentinean vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.2%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.87%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (65.0% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 4.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Argentinean | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 30.0% | Excellent 30.2% |
Argentinean vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 43.5%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 36.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 26.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Argentinean | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.5% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Argentinean vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.8%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 32.8%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.4% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.60%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.61%).
Education Level Metric | Argentinean | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.5% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.8% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.6% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.5% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.7% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.4% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.2% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.2% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.2% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Fair 1.8% |
Argentinean vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.5%), male disability (10.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.2%).
Disability Metric | Argentinean | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.0% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |