Zimbabwean vs Alsatian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Alsatian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Alsatians
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,075
SOCIAL INDEX
38.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
206th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Alsatian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,971,307 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.588. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.126% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 126.1 Alsatians.
Zimbabwean vs Alsatian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($110,011 compared to $103,010, a difference of 6.8%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,797, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $55,380, a difference of 1.7%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $40,060, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $47,023, a difference of 2.6%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Alsatian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Exceptional $47,284 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Average $103,010 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Average $85,053 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Good $47,023 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Good $55,380 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Good $40,060 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Tragic $49,267 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Average $95,059 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Average $100,435 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Good $61,797 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Alsatian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 33.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 31.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.7%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 16.4%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Alsatian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Poor 9.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 14.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 24.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 18.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 19.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 18.6% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 24.5% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 17.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 34.3% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Fair 11.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Good 11.4% |
Zimbabwean vs Alsatian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 42.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 32.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Alsatian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Alsatian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Alsatian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Poor 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Tragic 79.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Poor 35.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Fair 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Average 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 81.3% |
Zimbabwean vs Alsatian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 17.9%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Alsatian |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Tragic 61.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 25.3% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 44.8% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Good 6.2% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Poor 45.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 33.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Alsatian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 45.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 12.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Alsatian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Tragic 87.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 52.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Tragic 18.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Zimbabwean vs Alsatian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.6%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.23%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Alsatian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Excellent 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Excellent 98.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Excellent 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Excellent 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Good 97.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Good 97.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Good 97.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Good 97.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Good 95.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Average 94.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Average 93.8% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Good 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Average 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Good 89.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Good 86.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Exceptional 67.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Exceptional 61.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Exceptional 41.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Zimbabwean vs Alsatian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.4%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Alsatian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 11.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Excellent 22.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Average 47.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.4% |