Mongolian vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Mongolian
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Mongolians
Chinese
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Mongolian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,068,759 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.670. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.517% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 1,516.5 Chinese.
Mongolian vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,326 compared to $77,465, a difference of 18.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $58,162, a difference of 10.7%), and per capita income ($49,173 compared to $46,098, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,578 compared to $104,264, a difference of 0.30%), median family income ($114,553 compared to $116,188, a difference of 1.4%), and median female earnings ($42,542 compared to $41,461, a difference of 2.6%).
Income Metric | Mongolian | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,173 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,553 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,971 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,038 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,350 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,542 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,540 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,578 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,602 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,326 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.6% | Average 25.9% |
Mongolian vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 37.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 34.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.99%), receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.7%).
Poverty Metric | Mongolian | Chinese |
Poverty | Average 12.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Excellent 8.6% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Fair 11.3% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.2% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.2% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Mongolian vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 45.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Mongolian | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Mongolian vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.87%).
Labor Participation Metric | Mongolian | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 79.9% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.3% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.3% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.3% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Mongolian vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.2%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and family households (62.8% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Mongolian | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.9% | Excellent 30.2% |
Mongolian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 59.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 52.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 31.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Mongolian | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.8% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Mongolian vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 56.3%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 43.7%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.67%).
Education Level Metric | Mongolian | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Average 95.8% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Good 94.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Excellent 93.0% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.8% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 89.9% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.0% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.8% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.0% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.4% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.4% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.1% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.8% | Fair 1.8% |
Mongolian vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.3%), ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.8%), and male disability (10.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Disability Metric | Mongolian | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.8% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |