Slovak vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Slovak
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Slovaks
Chinese
6,550
SOCIAL INDEX
63.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
150th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Slovak Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,007,925 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Slovak communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slovaks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slovaks corresponds to an increase of 19.3 Chinese.
Slovak vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,039 compared to $77,465, a difference of 31.2%), median household income ($83,798 compared to $98,496, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,753 compared to $58,162, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,306 compared to $56,872, a difference of 1.0%), median earnings ($47,095 compared to $48,836, a difference of 3.7%), and per capita income ($44,229 compared to $46,098, a difference of 4.2%).
Income Metric | Slovak | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,229 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Good $103,729 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,798 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Good $47,095 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,306 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $39,029 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,753 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,032 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $101,029 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,039 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.9% | Average 25.9% |
Slovak vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 35.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 33.1%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 11.0%).
Poverty Metric | Slovak | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.6% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Fair 21.1% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.8% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Slovak vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 76.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 5.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Slovak | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.8% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Slovak vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.59%).
Labor Participation Metric | Slovak | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.9% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.8% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 42.6% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.7% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.8% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.3% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Slovak vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.6%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (48.3% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (47.6% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 5.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Slovak | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.6% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.06 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.3% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.4% | Excellent 30.2% |
Slovak vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 40.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.040%), no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Slovak | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.0% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Slovak vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 9.7%), college, 1 year or more (58.5% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and college, under 1 year (64.7% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.0%), high school diploma (92.0% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
Education Level Metric | Slovak | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.3% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.6% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Fair 64.7% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.5% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.3% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.3% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.9% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.3% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Fair 1.8% |
Slovak vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 49.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 38.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.8%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
Disability Metric | Slovak | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.8% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |