Immigrants from Europe vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,662,497 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.247. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Europe corresponds to a decrease of 4.1 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,828 compared to $77,465, a difference of 19.5%), per capita income ($50,950 compared to $46,098, a difference of 10.5%), and median male earnings ($62,057 compared to $56,872, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($115,523 compared to $116,188, a difference of 0.58%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,817 compared to $104,264, a difference of 2.5%), and median household income ($95,032 compared to $98,496, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 34.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 27.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.6%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 49.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family households (63.7% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 6.9%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 54.6%), no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 52.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 31.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.8%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.1%), and professional degree (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 19.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.54%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.65%).