Zimbabwean vs Iraqi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iraqi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Iraqis

Exceptional
Average
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,167
SOCIAL INDEX
49.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
183rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iraqi Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,661,202 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iraqis within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.639. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.770% in Iraqis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 769.8 Iraqis.
Zimbabwean Integration in Iraqi Communities

Zimbabwean vs Iraqi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($110,011 compared to $100,658, a difference of 9.3%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $60,466, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $90,764, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $50,802, a difference of 0.90%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $54,182, a difference of 3.9%).
Zimbabwean vs Iraqi Income
Income MetricZimbabweanIraqi
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Fair
$42,760
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Fair
$100,658
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Fair
$83,753
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Fair
$46,140
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Average
$54,182
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Poor
$38,666
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Tragic
$50,802
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Poor
$90,764
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Fair
$99,387
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Fair
$60,466
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Poor
26.6%

Zimbabwean vs Iraqi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 43.7%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 28.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.3%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 3.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Iraqi Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanIraqi
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Fair
12.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Fair
9.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Poor
11.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Poor
18.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Poor
17.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Excellent
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Fair
12.2%

Zimbabwean vs Iraqi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.4%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.63%).
Zimbabwean vs Iraqi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanIraqi
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.5%

Zimbabwean vs Iraqi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.70%).
Zimbabwean vs Iraqi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanIraqi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
82.2%

Zimbabwean vs Iraqi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.15%), family households (64.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Iraqi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanIraqi
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Average
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
27.6%

Zimbabwean vs Iraqi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.1%, a difference of 0.29%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Iraqi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanIraqi
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
57.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Average
19.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Fair
6.2%

Zimbabwean vs Iraqi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 36.5%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.7%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.59%).
Zimbabwean vs Iraqi Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanIraqi
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Good
89.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Good
86.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Excellent
60.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Good
47.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Good
39.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Average
1.8%

Zimbabwean vs Iraqi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.4%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.59%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Iraqi Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanIraqi
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Fair
11.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Fair
11.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
48.6%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%