Ghanaian vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,850,329 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.017. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to a decrease of 4.6 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,043 compared to $77,465, a difference of 29.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,277 compared to $116,156, a difference of 19.4%), and median household income ($83,582 compared to $98,496, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $41,461, a difference of 2.5%), median earnings ($46,440 compared to $48,836, a difference of 5.2%), and median male earnings ($52,810 compared to $56,872, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 59.1%), family poverty (10.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 58.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.2%), single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and single male poverty (13.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 41.6%), female unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 32.6%), and unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 52.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.7%), and married-couple households (42.2% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.7%), family households (63.5% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 100.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 68.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 9.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 25.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 45.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 73.7%), college, under 1 year (63.9% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and college, 1 year or more (58.4% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 44.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.7%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.7%).