Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,257,423 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.168. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 28.1 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $52,085, a difference of 26.4%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $88,267, a difference of 24.6%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $38,065, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $53,266, a difference of 3.9%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $36,023, a difference of 13.3%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 81.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 73.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 65.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.7%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 32.4%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.87%), family households (64.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.37, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.27%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 77.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 67.2%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.41%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.2%).