Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Exceptional
Excellent
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,970,453 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 73.0 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Zimbabwean Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $51,770, a difference of 13.0%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $62,217, a difference of 10.5%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $52,361, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $66,376, a difference of 0.79%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $111,914, a difference of 4.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
Income MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Exceptional
$51,770
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Exceptional
$116,165
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Exceptional
$95,319
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Exceptional
$52,361
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Exceptional
$62,217
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Exceptional
$43,571
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Exceptional
$54,352
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Exceptional
$106,888
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Exceptional
$111,914
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Exceptional
$66,376
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
27.3%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.3%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.20%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
13.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.6%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 14.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Fair
17.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.2%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.83%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Average
36.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.9%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.88%), family households (64.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
28.4%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 30.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
88.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
5.8%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.0%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.070%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Exceptional
69.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Exceptional
51.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%

Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.4%