British vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,349,805 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within British communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.547. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.054% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British corresponds to an increase of 54.0 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,940 compared to $77,465, a difference of 21.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,477 compared to $58,162, a difference of 13.0%), and wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,571 compared to $46,098, a difference of 1.0%), median earnings ($48,189 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.3%), and median male earnings ($57,890 compared to $56,872, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 30.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 27.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.34%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 62.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.0%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.5%), births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 22.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.10%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.8%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and master's degree (16.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 30.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.62%).