Immigrants from Japan vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,633,022 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Japan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.005. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Japan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Japan corresponds to a decrease of 1.6 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,359 compared to $46,098, a difference of 15.8%), median male earnings ($65,518 compared to $56,872, a difference of 15.2%), and median earnings ($54,938 compared to $48,836, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,498 compared to $116,156, a difference of 2.0%), median household income ($100,711 compared to $98,496, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,932 compared to $58,162, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 27.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 22.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.43%), single male poverty (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 14.5%), family households (63.4% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and married-couple households (47.7% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.18%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 40.9%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 39.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 57.8%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 42.6%), and master's degree (20.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 24.8%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.9%).