Cape Verdean vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Chinese
1,263
SOCIAL INDEX
10.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
317th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Cape Verdean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,977,936 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Cape Verdean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.998. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cape Verdeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.225% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cape Verdeans corresponds to an increase of 224.7 Chinese.
Cape Verdean vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($50,077 compared to $77,465, a difference of 54.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,580 compared to $116,156, a difference of 32.6%), and median household income ($75,848 compared to $98,496, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,614 compared to $41,461, a difference of 7.4%), median earnings ($44,640 compared to $48,836, a difference of 9.4%), and wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 9.8%).
Income Metric | Cape Verdean | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,935 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,848 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,848 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,640 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,103 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,614 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,387 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $85,758 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,580 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,077 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.6% | Average 25.9% |
Cape Verdean vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 115.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 84.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 75.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 7.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 25.3%).
Poverty Metric | Cape Verdean | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.9% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.3% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Cape Verdean vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 93.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 52.7%), and male unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 9.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Cape Verdean | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.5% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Cape Verdean vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.88%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cape Verdean | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.6% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 44.5% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.3% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.8% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Cape Verdean vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 71.5%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 49.4%), and births to unmarried women (41.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.6%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.4%), and family households (61.8% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 10.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Cape Verdean | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 61.8% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 38.1% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.17 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 39.6% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 41.3% | Excellent 30.2% |
Cape Verdean vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 101.2%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 89.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (46.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 28.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 59.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cape Verdean | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.5% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 46.8% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.4% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Cape Verdean vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 110.5%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 32.8%), and associate's degree (38.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Education Level Metric | Cape Verdean | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.5% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.1% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.4% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.0% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.3% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.8% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.9% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Fair 1.8% |
Cape Verdean vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (7.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 48.3%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 45.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.9%), male disability (12.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.4%).
Disability Metric | Cape Verdean | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.1% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.6% |