Cape Verdean vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cape Verdean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cape Verdeans

Chinese

Poor
Exceptional
1,263
SOCIAL INDEX
10.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
317th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Cape Verdean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,977,936 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Cape Verdean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.998. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cape Verdeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.225% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cape Verdeans corresponds to an increase of 224.7 Chinese.
Cape Verdean Integration in Chinese Communities

Cape Verdean vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($50,077 compared to $77,465, a difference of 54.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,580 compared to $116,156, a difference of 32.6%), and median household income ($75,848 compared to $98,496, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,614 compared to $41,461, a difference of 7.4%), median earnings ($44,640 compared to $48,836, a difference of 9.4%), and wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 9.8%).
Cape Verdean vs Chinese Income
Income MetricCape VerdeanChinese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,935
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,848
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,848
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,640
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,103
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,614
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,387
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$85,758
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,580
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,077
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.6%
Average
25.9%

Cape Verdean vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 115.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 84.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 75.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 7.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 25.3%).
Cape Verdean vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricCape VerdeanChinese
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Tragic
22.3%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
9.8%

Cape Verdean vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 93.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 52.7%), and male unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 9.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.3%).
Cape Verdean vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCape VerdeanChinese
Unemployment
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.9%

Cape Verdean vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.88%).
Cape Verdean vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCape VerdeanChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.6%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
44.5%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.3%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.0%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
84.1%

Cape Verdean vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 71.5%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 49.4%), and births to unmarried women (41.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.6%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.34, a difference of 5.4%), and family households (61.8% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 10.3%).
Cape Verdean vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCape VerdeanChinese
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
38.1%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.6%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
41.3%
Excellent
30.2%

Cape Verdean vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 101.2%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 89.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (46.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 28.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 59.2%).
Cape Verdean vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCape VerdeanChinese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.5%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
46.8%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.4%
Exceptional
8.8%

Cape Verdean vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 110.5%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 32.8%), and associate's degree (38.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Cape Verdean vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricCape VerdeanChinese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.5%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.1%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.4%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.0%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.3%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.8%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Fair
1.8%

Cape Verdean vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (7.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 48.3%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 45.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.9%), male disability (12.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.4%).
Cape Verdean vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricCape VerdeanChinese
Disability
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.1%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.6%