Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Chinese
5,686
SOCIAL INDEX
54.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
171st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Eastern Africa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,882,055 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Eastern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Africa corresponds to an increase of 7.4 Chinese.
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,157 compared to $77,465, a difference of 26.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,467 compared to $116,156, a difference of 18.0%), and median household income ($84,299 compared to $98,496, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,644 compared to $41,461, a difference of 2.0%), median earnings ($46,969 compared to $48,836, a difference of 4.0%), and per capita income ($43,838 compared to $46,098, a difference of 5.2%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,838 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Average $102,451 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Fair $84,299 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Good $46,969 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,713 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,644 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,158 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,458 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,467 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,157 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.8% | Average 25.9% |
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 49.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 47.6%), and family poverty (9.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.7%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.7%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Poor 9.5% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.1% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.3% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Average 5.2% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 47.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Chinese |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.41%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 68.5% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.3% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.4% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.9% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.9% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.9%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.9%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 61.1% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.9% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.22 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.2% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 31.0% | Excellent 30.2% |
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 54.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 32.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.7% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 64.4%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.5%), and master's degree (16.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.95%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.96%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.9% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Average 85.7% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 67.0% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.2% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.4% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.3% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 4.8% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 32.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 4.8%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.2% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |