Zimbabwean vs Tongan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tongan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Tongans

Exceptional
Good
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,132
SOCIAL INDEX
68.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
130th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tongan Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,553,129 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.140% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 140.3 Tongans.
Zimbabwean Integration in Tongan Communities

Zimbabwean vs Tongan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $56,972, a difference of 11.2%), per capita income ($45,804 compared to $41,693, a difference of 9.9%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $38,288, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $99,604, a difference of 1.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $108,643, a difference of 1.7%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $93,076, a difference of 2.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Tongan Income
Income MetricZimbabweanTongan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Tragic
$41,693
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Excellent
$105,967
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Exceptional
$93,076
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Fair
$45,665
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Fair
$53,218
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Tragic
$38,288
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Exceptional
$56,972
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Exceptional
$99,604
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Exceptional
$108,643
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Exceptional
$68,235
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
27.5%

Zimbabwean vs Tongan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 27.6%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 25.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Tongan Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanTongan
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
17.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
13.6%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
26.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.7%

Zimbabwean vs Tongan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.99%).
Zimbabwean vs Tongan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanTongan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
15.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
5.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%

Zimbabwean vs Tongan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.85%).
Zimbabwean vs Tongan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanTongan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Exceptional
67.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
41.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Excellent
83.1%

Zimbabwean vs Tongan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.0%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.49, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (47.0% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Tongan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanTongan
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Exceptional
69.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
31.2%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Exceptional
51.6%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
28.4%

Zimbabwean vs Tongan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 55.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 31.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Tongan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanTongan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
7.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
92.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
63.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Exceptional
26.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
10.0%

Zimbabwean vs Tongan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 41.9%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 39.9%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.59%).
Zimbabwean vs Tongan Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanTongan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
93.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Poor
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Poor
90.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Fair
64.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Poor
57.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
34.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Poor
1.7%

Zimbabwean vs Tongan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.57%).
Zimbabwean vs Tongan Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanTongan
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Fair
23.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
48.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%