U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
U.S. Virgin Islander
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
U.S. Virgin Islanders
Chinese
556
SOCIAL INDEX
3.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
343rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in U.S. Virgin Islander Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,722,962 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to an increase of 29.3 Chinese.
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,072 compared to $77,465, a difference of 48.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,736 compared to $116,156, a difference of 40.4%), and median household income ($71,853 compared to $98,496, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $41,461, a difference of 13.8%), median earnings ($41,448 compared to $48,836, a difference of 17.8%), and wage/income gap (21.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 20.3%).
Income Metric | U.S. Virgin Islander | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,589 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,294 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $71,853 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,448 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,066 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,424 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,448 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $78,911 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,736 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $52,072 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.5% | Average 25.9% |
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (12.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 90.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (22.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 85.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 84.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 17.6%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 32.3%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 32.3%).
Poverty Metric | U.S. Virgin Islander | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 17.3% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.5% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.0% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 24.2% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.6% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 9.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 36.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.9%).
Unemployment Metric | U.S. Virgin Islander | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.3% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | U.S. Virgin Islander | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.7% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.4% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.6% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.0% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.0% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.2% | Exceptional 84.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 66.8%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 30.9%), and married-couple households (39.8% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households (62.6% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 8.8%).
Family Structure Metric | U.S. Virgin Islander | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Poor 27.1% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 39.8% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.7% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 39.6% | Excellent 30.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 90.6%), no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 87.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 8.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 26.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 55.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | U.S. Virgin Islander | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 47.5% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.6% | Exceptional 8.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.88%), 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
Education Level Metric | U.S. Virgin Islander | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.1% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.1% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.6% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.8% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.1% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.1% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.4%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.44%), male disability (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | U.S. Virgin Islander | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.9% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |