Zimbabwean vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,451,040 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.808. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.497% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 1,497.4 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $59,090, a difference of 11.5%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $100,656, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $98,660, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $52,465, a difference of 2.4%), per capita income ($45,804 compared to $44,318, a difference of 3.4%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $39,228, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 32.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 25.8%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 1.4%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 15.4%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 24.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.5%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.4%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.84%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.1%).