Alsatian vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Alsatian
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Alsatians
Chinese
4,075
SOCIAL INDEX
38.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
206th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Alsatian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,117,519 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.333% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to an increase of 333.0 Chinese.
Alsatian vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,797 compared to $77,465, a difference of 25.4%), householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $58,162, a difference of 18.0%), and median household income ($85,053 compared to $98,496, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($47,284 compared to $46,098, a difference of 2.6%), median male earnings ($55,380 compared to $56,872, a difference of 2.7%), and median female earnings ($40,060 compared to $41,461, a difference of 3.5%).
Income Metric | Alsatian | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,284 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Average $103,010 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Average $85,053 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Good $47,023 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,380 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,060 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,267 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,059 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $100,435 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,797 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.7% | Average 25.9% |
Alsatian vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (19.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 60.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 56.3%), and single female poverty (24.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 15.7%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 17.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 34.4%).
Poverty Metric | Alsatian | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Poor 9.6% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.3% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Average 5.2% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Alsatian vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 44.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 27.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Alsatian | Chinese |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Poor 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Alsatian vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.57%).
Labor Participation Metric | Alsatian | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.7% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.9% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.8% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.9% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Average 84.4% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Alsatian vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.6%), married-couple households (44.8% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.9%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.34, a difference of 6.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Alsatian | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 61.7% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.8% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.7% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.8% | Excellent 30.2% |
Alsatian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 63.6%), no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 60.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 32.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Alsatian | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.1% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.5% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Alsatian vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.6%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.7%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%).
Education Level Metric | Alsatian | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Excellent 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Excellent 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Good 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Good 97.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Good 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Good 95.8% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Average 94.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Average 93.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Good 92.6% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.4% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.0% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.3% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.8% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.0% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.9% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Fair 1.8% |
Alsatian vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.3%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.53%), female disability (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Disability Metric | Alsatian | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.8% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.3% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |