Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,639,217 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Immigrants from Kazakhstan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 21.4 Immigrants from Kazakhstan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $48,747, a difference of 6.4%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $62,292, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $53,990, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($110,011 compared to $110,137, a difference of 0.11%), median household income ($90,618 compared to $91,015, a difference of 0.44%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $107,378, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.6%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.030%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.7%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.74%), currently married (47.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 50.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.9%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (51.3% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 0.16%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.9%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.3%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.0%).