Zimbabwean vs Malaysian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,527,771 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.819. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.659% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 658.9 Malaysians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $39,194, a difference of 16.9%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $95,230, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $58,244, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $51,615, a difference of 0.69%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $37,298, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 34.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 2.9%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.5%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.3%), currently married (47.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (64.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.0%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 60.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 56.1%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 19.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.5%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.1%).